Thread (13 messages) 13 messages, 4 authors, 2012-09-04

Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/2] i2c: pnx: Fix bit definitions

From: Wolfram Sang <hidden>
Date: 2012-09-04 09:20:36
Also in: lkml

On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 10:16:22PM +0200, Roland Stigge wrote:
Hi Wolfram,

On 20/08/12 19:55, Wolfram Sang wrote:
quoted
quoted
I've never had my hands on a PNX4008 chip at NXP, but I do
believe they are the same IP. That specific I2C IP was used in a
number of NXP/Phillips chips besides the PNX4008/LPC32xx. I don't
think there are any PNX4008's in the wild, and even working in
NXP, I can't find any non-marketing reference material for that
part (including the user manual).
Thanks for the heads up. I'll apply both patches, then.
Should I consider the two patches as applied now (where?
i2c-embedded?), or should I resend? ;-)
I will apply them these days and then let them stay in linux-next for a
few days. So, I'd think they should go in for rc6.

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

Attachments

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help