Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/2] i2c: pnx: Fix bit definitions
From: Wolfram Sang <hidden>
Date: 2012-09-04 09:20:36
Also in:
lkml
Attachments
- signature.asc [application/pgp-signature] 198 bytes
From: Wolfram Sang <hidden>
Date: 2012-09-04 09:20:36
Also in:
lkml
On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 10:16:22PM +0200, Roland Stigge wrote:
Hi Wolfram, On 20/08/12 19:55, Wolfram Sang wrote:quoted
quoted
I've never had my hands on a PNX4008 chip at NXP, but I do believe they are the same IP. That specific I2C IP was used in a number of NXP/Phillips chips besides the PNX4008/LPC32xx. I don't think there are any PNX4008's in the wild, and even working in NXP, I can't find any non-marketing reference material for that part (including the user manual).Thanks for the heads up. I'll apply both patches, then.Should I consider the two patches as applied now (where? i2c-embedded?), or should I resend? ;-)
I will apply them these days and then let them stay in linux-next for a few days. So, I'd think they should go in for rc6. -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |