Thread (61 messages) flat view 61 messages, 3 authors, 3d ago

Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] mshv: detect and report SEV-SNP support at init

From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
Date: 2026-08-25 04:19:47

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Missing memory barriers when updating and reading `mshv_ready` allows concurrent userspace opens to access uninitialized driver state on weakly-ordered architectures.
--
--- Patch [5]: [PATCH v3 5/7] mshv: detect and report SEV-SNP support at init ---
commit fb8f9421bc97a7ed49258a973cb3c9b05f5b3049
Author: Wei Liu [off-list ref]

mshv: detect and report SEV-SNP support at init

This commit queries MSHV dynamic processor features during parent
initialization to report SEV-SNP availability and the maximum number
of encrypted partitions. It also introduces a readiness flag to reject
userspace opens until initialization is complete.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/drivers/hv/mshv_root_main.c b/drivers/hv/mshv_root_main.c
--- a/drivers/hv/mshv_root_main.c
+++ b/drivers/hv/mshv_root_main.c
[ ... ]
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -2757,7 +2759,7 @@ static long mshv_dev_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int ioctl,
 static int
 mshv_dev_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
 {
-	return 0;
+	return READ_ONCE(mshv_ready) ? 0 : -EAGAIN;
[Severity: High]
Since READ_ONCE() does not provide a load-acquire barrier, could subsequent
loads in the ioctl path be reordered on weakly-ordered architectures like
ARM64?

If a userspace process concurrently opens the device and calls an ioctl
while the module is initializing, it might observe mshv_ready as true but
still access uninitialized driver structures. Would using smp_load_acquire()
here prevent this reordering?

[ ... ]
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -3022,6 +3124,7 @@ static int __init mshv_parent_partition_init(void)
 	hash_init(mshv_root.pt_htable);
 
 	hv_setup_mshv_handler(mshv_isr);
+	WRITE_ONCE(mshv_ready, true);
[Severity: High]
Because WRITE_ONCE() lacks a store-release barrier, is it possible for the
CPU to commit this store before the preceding stores that initialize the
driver state, such as the workqueue allocation or mshv_root.pt_htable?

Using smp_store_release() instead would ensure all preceding initialization
is globally visible before userspace can successfully open the device.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260825040505.826600-1-weh@linux.microsoft.com?part=5
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help