[PATCH v5 07/51] x86/sev: Move check for SNP Secure TSC support to tsc_early_init()

Move the check on having a Secure TSC to the common tsc_early_init() so
that it's obvious that having a Secure TSC is conditional, and to prepare
for adding TDX to the mix (blindly initializing *both* SNP and TDX TSC
logic looks especially weird).

No functional change intended.

Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikunj A Dadhania <redacted>
Reviewed-by: David Woodhouse <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
 arch/x86/coco/sev/core.c | 3 ---
 arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c    | 3 ++-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/coco/sev/core.c b/arch/x86/coco/sev/core.c
index 665de1aea0ee..403dcea86452 100644
--- a/arch/x86/coco/sev/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/coco/sev/core.c

@@ -2025,9 +2025,6 @@ void __init snp_secure_tsc_init(void)
 	unsigned long tsc_freq_mhz;
 	void *mem;
 
-	if (!cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_GUEST_SNP_SECURE_TSC))
-		return;
-
 	mem = early_memremap_encrypted(sev_secrets_pa, PAGE_SIZE);
 	if (!mem) {
 		pr_err("Unable to get TSC_FACTOR: failed to map the SNP secrets page.\n");

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
index 482cc3a8999a..8f1604ffe986 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c

@@ -1509,7 +1509,8 @@ void __init tsc_early_init(void)
 	if (is_early_uv_system())
 		return;
 
-	snp_secure_tsc_init();
+	if (cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_GUEST_SNP_SECURE_TSC))
+		snp_secure_tsc_init();
 
 	if (!determine_cpu_tsc_frequencies(true))
 		return;

-- 
2.55.0.rc0.799.gd6f94ed593-goog