On 10/4/2024 8:58 AM, Stanislav Kinsburskii wrote:
Hi Nuno,
On Thu, Oct 03, 2024 at 12:51:04PM -0700, Nuno Das Neves wrote:
quoted
diff --git a/arch/arm64/hyperv/hv_core.c b/arch/arm64/hyperv/hv_core.c
index 9d1969b875e9..bb7f28f74bf4 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/hyperv/hv_core.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/hyperv/hv_core.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
#include <linux/arm-smccc.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <asm-generic/bug.h>
+#define HYPERV_NONTLFS_HEADERS
#include <asm/mshyperv.h>
Perhaps it would be cleaner to introduce a new header file to be
included, containing the new define and including <asm/mshyperv.h> instead.
Stas
If I understand correctly, you're suggesting adding another stub named e.g.
"hv_mshyperv.h", containing:
#define HYPERV_NONTLFS_HEADERS
#include<asm/mshyperv.h>
Then in the roughly 24 places in this patch where we have:
+#define HYPERV_NONTLFS_HEADERS
Instead, we'd have:
-#include <asm/mshyperv.h>
+#include <hyperv/hv_mshyperv.h>
I suppose the current version is a bit opaque - it's not immediately clear
why HYPERV_NONTLFs_HEADERS is defined, and that it must be defined before
including asm/mshyperv.h - someone reading the code would have to go find
hv_defs.h to puzzle that out.
This improves the situation slightly by associating the #define with
asm/mshyperv.h. I'll consider it for v2, thanks!
Nuno