Thread (64 messages) 64 messages, 6 authors, 2021-08-24

RE: [PATCH V3 02/13] x86/HV: Initialize shared memory boundary in the Isolation VM.

From: Michael Kelley <hidden>
Date: 2021-08-12 19:18:37
Also in: linux-arch, linux-iommu, linux-scsi, lkml, netdev, xen-devel

From: Tianyu Lan <redacted> Sent: Monday, August 9, 2021 10:56 AM
Subject: [PATCH V3 02/13] x86/HV: Initialize shared memory boundary in the Isolation VM.
As with Patch 1, use the "x86/hyperv:" tag in the Subject line.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
From: Tianyu Lan <redacted>

Hyper-V exposes shared memory boundary via cpuid
HYPERV_CPUID_ISOLATION_CONFIG and store it in the
shared_gpa_boundary of ms_hyperv struct. This prepares
to share memory with host for SNP guest.

Signed-off-by: Tianyu Lan <redacted>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c |  2 ++
 include/asm-generic/mshyperv.h | 12 +++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c
index 6b5835a087a3..2b7f396ef1a5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c
@@ -313,6 +313,8 @@ static void __init ms_hyperv_init_platform(void)
 	if (ms_hyperv.priv_high & HV_ISOLATION) {
 		ms_hyperv.isolation_config_a = cpuid_eax(HYPERV_CPUID_ISOLATION_CONFIG);
 		ms_hyperv.isolation_config_b = cpuid_ebx(HYPERV_CPUID_ISOLATION_CONFIG);
+		ms_hyperv.shared_gpa_boundary =
+			(u64)1 << ms_hyperv.shared_gpa_boundary_bits;
You could use BIT_ULL() here, but it's kind of a shrug.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
 		pr_info("Hyper-V: Isolation Config: Group A 0x%x, Group B 0x%x\n",
 			ms_hyperv.isolation_config_a, ms_hyperv.isolation_config_b);
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/mshyperv.h b/include/asm-generic/mshyperv.h
index 4269f3174e58..aa26d24a5ca9 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/mshyperv.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/mshyperv.h
@@ -35,8 +35,18 @@ struct ms_hyperv_info {
 	u32 max_vp_index;
 	u32 max_lp_index;
 	u32 isolation_config_a;
-	u32 isolation_config_b;
+	union {
+		u32 isolation_config_b;
+		struct {
+			u32 cvm_type : 4;
+			u32 Reserved11 : 1;
+			u32 shared_gpa_boundary_active : 1;
+			u32 shared_gpa_boundary_bits : 6;
+			u32 Reserved12 : 20;
Any reason to name the reserved fields as "11" and "12"?  It
just looks a bit unusual.  And I'd suggest lowercase "r".
+		};
+	};
 	void  __percpu **ghcb_base;
+	u64 shared_gpa_boundary;
 };
 extern struct ms_hyperv_info ms_hyperv;

--
2.25.1
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help