Re: [PATCH v2] tools/hv: async name resolution in kvp_daemon

From
Olaf Hering <hidden>
Date
2021-03-19 14:47:11
Also in
lkml
Reply to
Olaf Hering, 2021-03-19
Am Fri, 19 Mar 2021 15:41:44 +0100
schrieb Olaf Hering [off-list ref]:
FullyQualifiedDomainName
I think in the past I did asked MSFT what the host side really expects. Maybe this time there will be an answer.

Why would the host expect a FQDN from a VM? Why would it care about DNS layout of the network within the VM?

Basically my copy of hv_kvp_daemon just sends `uname -n` to the host. This is more correct. This does not waste any network resources. This, up to now, led to no complains.

So, what is the purpose of this API?


Olaf

Attachments

Thread (2 messages) 2 messages, 1 author, last reply 2021-03-19
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread / next series-diff position
kprevious message in thread / previous series-diff position
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help