RE: [PATCH v2 4/4] hv_netvsc: Restrict configurations on isolated guests
From: Michael Kelley <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-29 00:40:00
Also in:
lkml, netdev
From: Andrea Parri (Microsoft) <parri.andrea@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2021 3:57 AM
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Restrict the NVSP protocol version(s) that will be negotiated with the host to be NVSP_PROTOCOL_VERSION_61 or greater if the guest is running isolated. Moreover, do not advertise the SR-IOV capability and ignore NVSP_MSG_4_TYPE_SEND_VF_ASSOCIATION messages in isolated guests, which are not supposed to support SR-IOV. This reduces the footprint of the code that will be exercised by Confidential VMs and hence the exposure to bugs and vulnerabilities. Signed-off-by: Andrea Parri (Microsoft) <parri.andrea@gmail.com> Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org --- drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc.c b/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc.c index 1510a236aa341..afd92b4aa21fe 100644 --- a/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc.c +++ b/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc.c@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ #include <linux/prefetch.h> #include <asm/sync_bitops.h> +#include <asm/mshyperv.h> #include "hyperv_net.h" #include "netvsc_trace.h"@@ -544,7 +545,10 @@ static int negotiate_nvsp_ver(struct hv_device *device, init_packet->msg.v2_msg.send_ndis_config.capability.ieee8021q = 1; if (nvsp_ver >= NVSP_PROTOCOL_VERSION_5) { - init_packet->msg.v2_msg.send_ndis_config.capability.sriov = 1; + if (!hv_is_isolation_supported()) + init_packet->msg.v2_msg.send_ndis_config.capability.sriov = 1; + else + netdev_info(ndev, "SR-IOV not advertised by guests on the host supporting isolation\n");
Nit: Flip the "if" and "else" clauses so that the ! isn't needed in the test.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
/* Teaming bit is needed to receive link speed updates */ init_packet->msg.v2_msg.send_ndis_config.capability.teaming = 1;@@ -563,6 +567,13 @@ static int negotiate_nvsp_ver(struct hv_device *device, return ret; } +static bool nvsp_is_valid_version(u32 version) +{ + if (hv_is_isolation_supported()) + return version >= NVSP_PROTOCOL_VERSION_61; + return true; +} + static int netvsc_connect_vsp(struct hv_device *device, struct netvsc_device *net_device, const struct netvsc_device_info *device_info)@@ -579,12 +590,19 @@ static int netvsc_connect_vsp(struct hv_device *device, init_packet = &net_device->channel_init_pkt; /* Negotiate the latest NVSP protocol supported */ - for (i = ARRAY_SIZE(ver_list) - 1; i >= 0; i--) + for (i = ARRAY_SIZE(ver_list) - 1; i >= 0; i--) { if (negotiate_nvsp_ver(device, net_device, init_packet, ver_list[i]) == 0) { + if (!nvsp_is_valid_version(ver_list[i])) {
Could this test go after the 'for' loop, like the test for i < 0? That would get the code unindented a lot. And maybe the helper function logic (i.e., nvsp_is_valid_version) could just be coded inline.
+ netdev_err(ndev, "Invalid NVSP version 0x%x (expected >= 0x%x) from the host with isolation supported\n",
Nit: The other two new messages use the phrase "... the host supporting isolation".
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+ ver_list[i], NVSP_PROTOCOL_VERSION_61); + ret = -EPROTO; + goto cleanup; + } net_device->nvsp_version = ver_list[i]; break; } + } if (i < 0) { ret = -EPROTO;@@ -1357,7 +1375,10 @@ static void netvsc_receive_inband(struct net_device *ndev, break; case NVSP_MSG4_TYPE_SEND_VF_ASSOCIATION: - netvsc_send_vf(ndev, nvmsg, msglen); + if (!hv_is_isolation_supported()) + netvsc_send_vf(ndev, nvmsg, msglen); + else + netdev_err(ndev, "Ignore VF_ASSOCIATION msg from the host supporting isolation\n");
Nit: Flip the "if" and "else" clauses so that the ! isn't needed in the test.
break; } } -- 2.25.1