On 24 October 2020 10:13:36 BST, Paolo Bonzini [off-list ref] wrote:

On 24/10/20 10:26, David Woodhouse wrote:

quoted

I was also hoping Paolo was going to take the patch which just

defines

quoted

the KVM_FEATURE_MSI_EXT_DEST_ID bit² ASAP, so that we end up with a
second patch³ that *just* wires it up to x86_init.msi_ext_dest_id()

for

quoted

KVM.

¹

https://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/linux.git/commitdiff/734719c1f4

quoted

²

https://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/linux.git/commitdiff/3f371d6749

quoted

³

https://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/linux.git/commitdiff/8399e14eb5

Yes, I am going to take it.

I was already sort of playing with fire with the 5.10 pull request (and
with me being lousy in general during the 5.10 development period, to
be
honest), so I left it for rc2 or rc3.  It's just docs and it happened
to
conflict with another documentation patch that had gone in through Jon
Corbet's tree.

OK, thanks. I'll rework Thomas's tree with that first and the other changes I'd mentioned in my parts, as well as fixing up that unholy chimæra of struct/union in which we set some bitfields from each side of the union, test and push it out later today.

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.