On 02.10.20 15:24, Michal Hocko wrote:

On Mon 28-09-20 20:21:08, David Hildenbrand wrote:

quoted

Page isolation doesn't actually touch the pages, it simply isolates
pageblocks and moves all free pages to the MIGRATE_ISOLATE freelist.

We already place pages to the tail of the freelists when undoing
isolation via __putback_isolated_page(), let's do it in any case
(e.g., if order <= pageblock_order) and document the behavior.

Add a "to_tail" parameter to move_freepages_block() but introduce a
a new move_to_free_list_tail() - similar to add_to_free_list_tail().

This change results in all pages getting onlined via online_pages() to
be placed to the tail of the freelist.

Is there anything preventing to do this unconditionally? Or in other
words is any of the existing callers of move_freepages_block benefiting
from adding to the head?

1. mm/page_isolation.c:set_migratetype_isolate()

We move stuff to the MIGRATE_ISOLATE list, we don't care about the order
there.

2. steal_suitable_fallback():

I don't think we care too much about the order when already stealing
pageblocks ... and the freelist is empty I guess?

3. reserve_highatomic_pageblock()/unreserve_highatomic_pageblock()

Not sure if we really care.

Good question, I tried to be careful of what I touch. Thoughts?

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb