Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] PCI: hv: Introduce hv_msi_entry
From: Andrew Murray <hidden>
Date: 2020-02-03 09:51:46
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-pci, lkml
On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 01:03:13PM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
Add a new structure (hv_msi_entry), which is also defined int tlfs, to
s/int/in the/ ?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
describe the msi entry for HVCALL_RETARGET_INTERRUPT. The structure is needed because its layout may be different from architecture to architecture. Also add a new generic interface hv_set_msi_address_from_desc() to allow different archs to set the msi address from msi_desc. No functional change, only preparation for the future support of virtual PCI on non-x86 architectures. Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng (Microsoft) <redacted> --- arch/x86/include/asm/hyperv-tlfs.h | 11 +++++++++-- arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h | 5 +++++ drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c | 4 ++-- 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/hyperv-tlfs.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/hyperv-tlfs.h index 4a76e442481a..953b3ad38746 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/hyperv-tlfs.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/hyperv-tlfs.h@@ -912,11 +912,18 @@ struct hv_partition_assist_pg { u32 tlb_lock_count; }; +union hv_msi_entry { + u64 as_uint64; + struct { + u32 address; + u32 data; + } __packed; +}; + struct hv_interrupt_entry { u32 source; /* 1 for MSI(-X) */ u32 reserved1; - u32 address; - u32 data; + union hv_msi_entry msi_entry; } __packed; /*diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h index 6b79515abb82..3bdaa3b6e68f 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h@@ -240,6 +240,11 @@ bool hv_vcpu_is_preempted(int vcpu); static inline void hv_apic_init(void) {} #endif +#define hv_set_msi_address_from_desc(msi_entry, msi_desc) \ +do { \ + (msi_entry)->address = (msi_desc)->msg.address_lo; \ +} while (0)
Given that this is a single statement, is there really a need for the do ; while(0) ?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+ #else /* CONFIG_HYPERV */ static inline void hyperv_init(void) {} static inline void hyperv_setup_mmu_ops(void) {}diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c index 0d9b74503577..2240f2b3643e 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c@@ -1170,8 +1170,8 @@ static void hv_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *data) memset(params, 0, sizeof(*params)); params->partition_id = HV_PARTITION_ID_SELF; params->int_entry.source = 1; /* MSI(-X) */ - params->int_entry.address = msi_desc->msg.address_lo; - params->int_entry.data = msi_desc->msg.data; + hv_set_msi_address_from_desc(¶ms->int_entry.msi_entry, msi_desc); + params->int_entry.msi_entry.data = msi_desc->msg.data;
If the layout may differ, then don't we also need a wrapper for data? Thanks, Andrew Murray
params->device_id = (hbus->hdev->dev_instance.b[5] << 24) | (hbus->hdev->dev_instance.b[4] << 16) | (hbus->hdev->dev_instance.b[7] << 8) | -- 2.24.1