Thread (9 messages) 9 messages, 3 authors, 2020-01-23

Re: [PATCH V3,net-next, 1/2] hv_netvsc: Add XDP support

From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hidden>
Date: 2020-01-22 19:51:51
Also in: lkml, netdev

On Wed, 22 Jan 2020 09:23:33 -0800
Haiyang Zhang [off-list ref] wrote:
+u32 netvsc_run_xdp(struct net_device *ndev, struct netvsc_channel *nvchan,
+		   struct xdp_buff *xdp)
+{
+	void *data = nvchan->rsc.data[0];
+	u32 len = nvchan->rsc.len[0];
+	struct page *page = NULL;
+	struct bpf_prog *prog;
+	u32 act = XDP_PASS;
+
+	xdp->data_hard_start = NULL;
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	prog = rcu_dereference(nvchan->bpf_prog);
+
+	if (!prog)
+		goto out;
+
+	/* allocate page buffer for data */
+	page = alloc_page(GFP_ATOMIC);
The alloc_page() + __free_page() alone[1] cost 231 cycles(tsc) 64.395 ns.
Thus, the XDP_DROP case will already be limited to just around 10Gbit/s
14.88 Mpps (67.2ns).

XDP is suppose to be done for performance reasons. This looks like a
slowdown.

Measurement tool:
[1] https://github.com/netoptimizer/prototype-kernel/blob/master/kernel/mm/bench/page_bench01.c
+	if (!page) {
+		act = XDP_DROP;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	xdp->data_hard_start = page_address(page);
+	xdp->data = xdp->data_hard_start + NETVSC_XDP_HDRM;
+	xdp_set_data_meta_invalid(xdp);
+	xdp->data_end = xdp->data + len;
+	xdp->rxq = &nvchan->xdp_rxq;
+	xdp->handle = 0;
+
+	memcpy(xdp->data, data, len);
And a memcpy.
+
+	act = bpf_prog_run_xdp(prog, xdp);
+
+	switch (act) {
+	case XDP_PASS:
+	case XDP_TX:
+	case XDP_DROP:
+		break;
+
+	case XDP_ABORTED:
+		trace_xdp_exception(ndev, prog, act);
+		break;
+
+	default:
+		bpf_warn_invalid_xdp_action(act);
+	}
+
+out:
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+
+	if (page && act != XDP_PASS && act != XDP_TX) {
+		__free_page(page);
Given this runs under NAPI you could optimize this easily for XDP_DROP
(and XDP_ABORTED) by recycling the page in a driver local cache. (The
page_pool also have a driver local cache build in, but it might be
overkill to use page_pool in this simple case).

You could do this in a followup patch.
+		xdp->data_hard_start = NULL;
+	}
+
+	return act;
+}


-- 
Best regards,
  Jesper Dangaard Brouer
  MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
  LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help