Thread (4 messages) 4 messages, 3 authors, 2021-03-15

Re: [PATCH] seq_file: Unconditionally use vmalloc for buffer

From: Kees Cook <hidden>
Date: 2021-03-15 17:41:27
Also in: linux-fsdevel, lkml

On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 09:34:18AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Fri 12-03-21 12:55:58, Kees Cook wrote:
quoted
The sysfs interface to seq_file continues to be rather fragile, as seen
with some recent exploits[1]. Move the seq_file buffer to the vmap area
(while retaining the accounting flag), since it has guard pages that
will catch and stop linear overflows. This seems justified given that
seq_file already uses kvmalloc(), that allocations are normally short
lived, and that they are not normally performance critical.
What is the runtime effect of this change? The interface is widely used
I haven't been able to measure any differences yet, but maybe I lack
imagination about workloads that are heavy on /sys or /proc accesses.
for many other interfaces - e.g. in proc. While from the correctness POV
this should be OK (ish for 64b it is definitely problem for kernels with
lowmem and limited vmalloc space). Vmalloc is also to be expected to
regress in performance for small allocations which is the most usual
case.
seq_file's default size is PAGE_SIZE (and just goes up by powers of 2
from there), with the rare (3 callers) exception of single_open_size(),
which for at least 1 case is always >PAGE_SIZE. (I realize PAGE_SIZE may
be considered "small" for vmalloc, but I think gaining the guard page is
worth it, given the recurring flaws we see with at least sysfs handlers.)

-Kees
 
quoted
[1] https://blog.grimm-co.com/2021/03/new-old-bugs-in-linux-kernel.html

Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <redacted>
---
 fs/seq_file.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/seq_file.c b/fs/seq_file.c
index cb11a34fb871..ad78577d4c2c 100644
--- a/fs/seq_file.c
+++ b/fs/seq_file.c
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ static void seq_set_overflow(struct seq_file *m)
 
 static void *seq_buf_alloc(unsigned long size)
 {
-	return kvmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
+	return __vmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ static int traverse(struct seq_file *m, loff_t offset)
 
 Eoverflow:
 	m->op->stop(m, p);
-	kvfree(m->buf);
+	vfree(m->buf);
 	m->count = 0;
 	m->buf = seq_buf_alloc(m->size <<= 1);
 	return !m->buf ? -ENOMEM : -EAGAIN;
@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ ssize_t seq_read_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter)
 			goto Fill;
 		// need a bigger buffer
 		m->op->stop(m, p);
-		kvfree(m->buf);
+		vfree(m->buf);
 		m->count = 0;
 		m->buf = seq_buf_alloc(m->size <<= 1);
 		if (!m->buf)
@@ -349,7 +349,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(seq_lseek);
 int seq_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
 {
 	struct seq_file *m = file->private_data;
-	kvfree(m->buf);
+	vfree(m->buf);
 	kmem_cache_free(seq_file_cache, m);
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -585,7 +585,7 @@ int single_open_size(struct file *file, int (*show)(struct seq_file *, void *),
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	ret = single_open(file, show, data);
 	if (ret) {
-		kvfree(buf);
+		vfree(buf);
 		return ret;
 	}
 	((struct seq_file *)file->private_data)->buf = buf;
-- 
2.25.1
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
-- 
Kees Cook
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help