On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 07:02:43PM +0200, Emil Renner Berthing wrote:

On Mon, 18 Oct 2021 at 18:29, Andy Shevchenko [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 7:23 PM Andy Shevchenko
[off-list ref] wrote:

...

quoted

Having a second look I found even problematic error paths because of
mixing devm_*() with non-devm_*() calls, which only assures me that
your ->probe() error path is broken and should be revisited.

So do you want to expand on that now or should I send v2 first?

Here is not enough context anymore to point out. I expect one to have done
their homework anyway.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko