Re: [libgpiod v2.0][PATCH] core: extend config objects
From: Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com>
Date: 2021-08-08 23:10:20
On Sun, Aug 08, 2021 at 09:11:14PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
On Sat, Aug 7, 2021 at 10:48 AM Kent Gibson [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Fri, Aug 06, 2021 at 03:28:10PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:quoted
Kent suggested that we may want to add getters for the config objects in his reviews under the C++ patches. Indeed when working on Python bindings I noticed it would be useful for implementing __str__ and __repr__ callbacks. In C++ too we could use them for overloading stream operators. This extends the config objects with getters. They are straightforward for the request config but for the line config, they allow to only read per-offset values that would be used if the object was used in a request at this moment. We also add getters for the output values: both taking the line offset as argument as well as ones that take the index and allow to iterate over all configured output values. The sanitization of input for the getters has subsequently been changed so that we never return invalid values. The input values are verified immediately and if an invalid value is passed, it's silently replaced by the default value for given setting. This patch also adds the reset function for the line config object - it can be used to reset all stored configuration if - for example - the config has become too complex. As this patch will be squashed into the big v2 patch anyway, I allowed myself to include some additional changes: some variable renames and other minor tweaks. Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <redacted>A few minor nit-picks in the gpiod.h documentation below... Cheers, Kent.Thanks, With that fixed, do you think it's good to be applied?
Sure. I was also wondering if anything could be done to simplify the structures in line-config.c, but that isn't specific to this patch. Not having access to the offsets, or even num_lines, and doing the allocation up-front makes it rather painful. Especially if the most common case is only one or two lines. But, as long as you are happy with the external API, that is just implementation detail that can be optimised later. Cheers, Kent.