Thread (8 messages) 8 messages, 2 authors, 2021-08-31
STALE1740d

[PATCH 3/3] gpio: mpc8xxx: Use 'devm_gpiochip_add_data()' to simplify the code and avoid a leak

From: Christophe JAILLET <hidden>
Date: 2021-08-20 15:38:22
Also in: kernel-janitors, lkml
Subsystem: gpio subsystem, the rest · Maintainers: Linus Walleij, Bartosz Golaszewski, Linus Torvalds

If an error occurs after a 'gpiochip_add_data()' call it must be undone by
a corresponding 'gpiochip_remove()' as already done in the remove function.

To simplify the code a fix a leak in the error handling path of the probe,
use the managed version instead (i.e. 'devm_gpiochip_add_data()')

Fixes: 698b8eeaed72 ("gpio/mpc8xxx: change irq handler from chained to normal")
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <redacted>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-mpc8xxx.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mpc8xxx.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mpc8xxx.c
index fa4aaeced3f1..70d6ae20b1da 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mpc8xxx.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mpc8xxx.c
@@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ static int mpc8xxx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	    is_acpi_node(fwnode))
 		gc->write_reg(mpc8xxx_gc->regs + GPIO_IBE, 0xffffffff);
 
-	ret = gpiochip_add_data(gc, mpc8xxx_gc);
+	ret = devm_gpiochip_add_data(&pdev->dev, gc, mpc8xxx_gc);
 	if (ret) {
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev,
 			"GPIO chip registration failed with status %d\n", ret);
@@ -429,8 +429,6 @@ static int mpc8xxx_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		irq_domain_remove(mpc8xxx_gc->irq);
 	}
 
-	gpiochip_remove(&mpc8xxx_gc->gc);
-
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.30.2
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help