Re: [PATCH] firmware: QCOM_SCM: Allow qcom_scm driver to be loadable as a permenent module
From: John Stultz <hidden>
Date: 2021-07-21 17:24:18
Also in:
linux-arm-msm, linux-iommu, lkml
From: John Stultz <hidden>
Date: 2021-07-21 17:24:18
Also in:
linux-arm-msm, linux-iommu, lkml
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 4:54 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 04:53:20AM +0000, John Stultz wrote:quoted
Allow the qcom_scm driver to be loadable as a permenent module.This feels like a regression, it should be allowed to be a module.
I'm sorry, I'm not sure I'm following you, Greg. This patch is trying to enable the driver to be able to be loaded as a module.
quoted
This still uses the "depends on QCOM_SCM || !QCOM_SCM" bit to ensure that drivers that call into the qcom_scm driver are also built as modules. While not ideal in some cases its the only safe way I can find to avoid build errors without having those drivers select QCOM_SCM and have to force it on (as QCOM_SCM=n can be valid for those drivers). Reviving this now that Saravana's fw_devlink defaults to on, which should avoid loading troubles seen before.fw_devlink was supposed to resolve these issues and _allow_ code to be built as modules and not forced to be built into the kernel.
Right. I'm re-submitting this patch to enable a driver to work as a module, because earlier attempts to submit it ran into boot trouble because fw_devlink wasn't yet enabled. I worry something in my description made it seem otherwise, so let me know how you read it and I'll try to avoid such confusion in the future. thanks -john