Thread (13 messages) 13 messages, 4 authors, 2021-07-23

Re: [PATCH] firmware: QCOM_SCM: Allow qcom_scm driver to be loadable as a permenent module

From: John Stultz <hidden>
Date: 2021-07-21 17:24:18
Also in: linux-arm-msm, linux-iommu, lkml

On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 4:54 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
[off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 04:53:20AM +0000, John Stultz wrote:
quoted
Allow the qcom_scm driver to be loadable as a permenent module.
This feels like a regression, it should be allowed to be a module.
I'm sorry, I'm not sure I'm following you, Greg.  This patch is trying
to enable the driver to be able to be loaded as a module.
quoted
This still uses the "depends on QCOM_SCM || !QCOM_SCM" bit to
ensure that drivers that call into the qcom_scm driver are
also built as modules. While not ideal in some cases its the
only safe way I can find to avoid build errors without having
those drivers select QCOM_SCM and have to force it on (as
QCOM_SCM=n can be valid for those drivers).

Reviving this now that Saravana's fw_devlink defaults to on,
which should avoid loading troubles seen before.
fw_devlink was supposed to resolve these issues and _allow_ code to be
built as modules and not forced to be built into the kernel.
Right. I'm re-submitting this patch to enable a driver to work as a
module, because earlier attempts to submit it ran into boot trouble
because fw_devlink wasn't yet enabled.

I worry something in my description made it seem otherwise, so let me
know how you read it and I'll try to avoid such confusion in the
future.

thanks
-john
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help