Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] pinctrl: pinmux: Add pinmux-select debugfs file
From: Dan Carpenter <hidden>
Date: 2021-02-11 07:42:06
Also in:
lkml
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 11:24:23PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
On Thu, 2021-02-11 at 10:11 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:quoted
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 02:28:54PM -0800, Drew Fustini wrote:quoted
+ ret = strncpy_from_user(buf, user_buf, PINMUX_MAX_NAME * 2); + if (ret < 0) { + dev_err(pctldev->dev, "failed to copy buffer from userspace"); + goto free_gname; + } + buf[len-1] = '\0'; + + ret = sscanf(buf, "%s %s", fname, gname); + if (ret != 2) { + dev_err(pctldev->dev, "expected format: <function-name> <group-name>"); + goto free_gname;We need a "ret = -EINVAL;" before the goto. sscanf doesn't return error codes. Normally we would write it like so: if (sscanf(buf, "%s %s", fname, gname) != 2) { dev_err(pctldev->dev, "expected format: <function-name> <group-name>"); ret = -EINVAL; goto free_gname; } I'm going to write a Smatch check for this today.It's a pretty frequently used style: $ git grep -P '\w+\s*=\s+sscanf\b' | wc -l 327
Yeah. That's true. I looked through a couple of those and they were fine. (Sample size 2) But the other format is more common. $ git grep sscanf | grep = | wc -l 803 I have written a Smatch check to complain whenever we propogate the return value from sscanf. I'll let you know tomorrow how that goes. I should write another check which says "On this error path, we know sscanf was not equal to the value we wanted but we are still returning success". regards, dan carpenter