Thread (9 messages) 9 messages, 3 authors, 2021-01-15

Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] gpio: mvebu: document zero pwm duty cycle limitation

From: Uwe Kleine-König <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-14 20:27:07
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-pwm

Hello Baruch,

On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 08:57:37PM +0200, Baruch Siach wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Add a comment on why the code never sets on/off registers to zero.

Reported-by: Uwe Kleine-König <redacted>
Analyzed-by: Russell King [off-list ref]
Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c
index 6b017854ce61..09780944bef9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c
@@ -706,6 +706,10 @@ static int mvebu_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
 	do_div(val, NSEC_PER_SEC);
 	if (val > UINT_MAX)
 		return -EINVAL;
+	/*
+	 * Zero on/off values don't work as expected. Experimentation shows
+	 * that zero value is treated as 2^32. This behavior is not documented.
+	 */
This is too easy. The right thing to do is to adapt .apply and
.get_state to use this new information.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

Attachments

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help