Hello Baruch,
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 08:57:37PM +0200, Baruch Siach wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Add a comment on why the code never sets on/off registers to zero.
Reported-by: Uwe Kleine-König <redacted>
Analyzed-by: Russell King [off-list ref]
Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>
---
drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c
index 6b017854ce61..09780944bef9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c
@@ -706,6 +706,10 @@ static int mvebu_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
do_div(val, NSEC_PER_SEC);
if (val > UINT_MAX)
return -EINVAL;
+ /*
+ * Zero on/off values don't work as expected. Experimentation shows
+ * that zero value is treated as 2^32. This behavior is not documented.
+ */
This is too easy. The right thing to do is to adapt .apply and
.get_state to use this new information.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |