Thread (14 messages) 14 messages, 3 authors, 2021-01-13
STALE1986d
Revisions (5)
  1. v1 current
  2. v2 [diff vs current]
  3. v3 [diff vs current]
  4. v4 [diff vs current]
  5. v5 [diff vs current]

[PATCH 4/5] gpio: mvebu: don't limit pwm period/duty_cycle to UINT_MAX

From: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>
Date: 2021-01-11 11:18:45
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-pwm
Subsystem: gpio subsystem, the rest · Maintainers: Linus Walleij, Bartosz Golaszewski, Linus Torvalds

PWM on/off registers are limited to UINT_MAX. However the state period
and duty_cycle fields are ns values of type u64. There is no reason to
limit them to UINT_MAX.

Reported-by: Uwe Kleine-König <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c | 8 ++------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c
index 6fc64846eda3..eb7456fa6d86 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c
@@ -669,9 +669,7 @@ static void mvebu_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip,
 	regmap_read(mvpwm->regs, mvebu_pwmreg_blink_on_duration(mvpwm), &u);
 	val = (unsigned long long) u * NSEC_PER_SEC;
 	val = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(val, mvpwm->clk_rate);
-	if (val > UINT_MAX)
-		state->duty_cycle = UINT_MAX;
-	else if (val)
+	if (val)
 		state->duty_cycle = val;
 	else
 		state->duty_cycle = 1;
@@ -681,9 +679,7 @@ static void mvebu_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip,
 	val += (unsigned long long) u; /* period = on + off duration */
 	val *= NSEC_PER_SEC;
 	val = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(val, mvpwm->clk_rate);
-	if (val > UINT_MAX)
-		state->period = UINT_MAX;
-	else if (val)
+	if (val)
 		state->period = val;
 	else
 		state->period = 1;
-- 
2.29.2
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help