On Thu 21 Jan 07:20 CST 2021, Linus Walleij wrote:

On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 11:21 PM Bjorn Andersson
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Several properties are shared between all TLMM bindings. By providing a
common binding to define these properties each platform's binding can be
reduced to just listing which of these properties should be checked for
- or further specified.

Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <redacted>

Overall it looks good, just cutting some slack for reviewers (especially
DT people) before applying.

quoted

+description:
+  This defines the common properties used to describe all Qualcomm TLMM
+  bindings and pinconf/pinmux states for these.

I vaguely recall asking you in the past what the acronym TLMM actually
means. This would be a good place to expand the acronym so people
know what these four letters actually represent.

As Vinod said, it's used in a few places and I agree that we should
spell it out here.

In particular I had to include "phandle" in the list of valid properties
for for the dtbs_check to pass when there are references to state nodes,
so I would like to hear from Rob about that.

Will respin this after getting his input - hopefully with his Ack ;)

(There, I finally gave you an official reason to go and poke Qualcomm
hardware engineers about this. ;)

:)

Regards,
Bjorn