Thread (10 messages) 10 messages, 6 authors, 2020-02-21

Re: [PATCH] gpio: siox: use raw spinlock for irq related locking

From: Uwe Kleine-König <hidden>
Date: 2020-02-14 12:20:41
Also in: kernel-janitors

Hello Thorsten,

On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 12:02:38PM +0100, Thorsten Scherer wrote:
AFAICT this is all good.

Unfortunately i don't have any idea on how to test out the difference
this patch makes on a real SIOX.
When I started looking into the problem I expected that the lock
debugging would catch these problems. But either I did something wrong
or there is no mechanism that catches

 - a spinlock is taken when there is already a raw spinlock taken
 - spin_lock_irq is used with irqs already off

And I wonder if there are reasons I don't see that make these two tests
a bad idea.
Any hints? Is it necessary at all?
Apart from "normal" testing that SIOX still works I have no good
suggestion. Having said that I would be surprised if my patch breaked
something. (But it wouldn't be the first time such a surprise happens
:-)

Best regards
Uwe
-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help