On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 11:24:35AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 10:16 AM, Maxime Ripard
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 09:17:15AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 9:11 AM, Maxime Ripard
[off-list ref] wrote:
This is slightly embarrassing, but that patch doesn't actually fix
anything. I tried to be smart and rework it to look nicer, and
obviously failed.
Can you squash
http://code.bulix.org/z1vkt1-286673
in the commit?
This site is down.
Sorry :/
Can you send a new version of the patch or just reply with the
change inline here?
Here it is:
---------8<----------------
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
index c92847ff5d0a..ae70f679459c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
@@ -241,8 +241,6 @@ struct gpio_desc *of_find_gpio(struct device *dev, const char *con_id,
desc = of_get_named_gpiod_flags(dev->of_node, prop_name, idx,
&of_flags);
- if (!IS_ERR(desc) || (PTR_ERR(desc) != -ENOENT))
- break;
/*
* -EPROBE_DEFER in our case means that we found a@@ -256,6 +254,9 @@ struct gpio_desc *of_find_gpio(struct device *dev, const char *con_id,
*/
if (IS_ERR(desc) && PTR_ERR(desc) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
return desc;
+
+ if (!IS_ERR(desc) || (PTR_ERR(desc) != -ENOENT))
+ break;
}
/* Special handling for SPI GPIOs if used */
----------8<-----------------
--
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com