Alexandre, Linux

On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 12:53 AM, Linus Walleij
[off-list ref] wrote:

On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 10:23 AM, Philippe Ombredanne
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Linus Walleij [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

quoted

+// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR MIT)

Wow never saw that before. OK I guess.

That's the new thing. Less legalese boilerplate, and more code for the
better IMHO.

You can check the doc patches from Thomas for details [1]

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/12/4/934

Yeah I'm aware of this part, but I didn't see that combined license
before.

What is the reason for not just using GPL 2 here?

Linus,
That'a a question for Alexandre that submitted this patch in the first
place, not me.

Alexandre?

-- 
Cordially
Philippe Ombredanne