On Wed, 2017-08-23 at 10:23 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:

quoted

On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 1:54 AM, Andrew Jeffery [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, 2017-08-22 at 14:52 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:

quoted

quoted

quoted

quoted

quoted

quoted

On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 6:21 PM, Yong Li [off-list ref] wrote:

On AST2500, the hardware strap register(SCU70) only accepts write ‘1’,
to clear it to ‘0’, must set bits(write  ‘1’) to SCU7C

Signed-off-by: Yong Li <redacted>

Patch applied with Andrew's review/test tags.

I realised after I sent the tags on v3 that I'd made a mistake: There's a
slightly awkward to test bug in the v3 implementation. I followed up on v3 with
this:

        https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/8/16/905

And Yong sent out a corresponding v4:

        https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/802946/

Ah. I got confused and picked the wrong version.

Entirely my fault. Apologies again for the confusion. I owe you a few drinks if
we ever meet :)

quoted

I see you've pushed Yong's v3 in pinctrl/devel - can we revert/remove that and
apply v4?

No I would have to revert the patch.

Can't we simply make a small fixup patch?

I couldn't recall what the rebase policy was for pinctrl/devel.

I have sent the fixup patch:

	http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/804981/

Cheers,

Andrew

Yours,
Linus Walleij