在 2016/9/27 6:35, Heiko Stuebner 写道:

Am Samstag, 24. September 2016, 18:24:11 CEST schrieb Shawn Lin:

quoted

On 2016/9/24 2:26, Jacob Chen wrote:

quoted

From: Jacob Chen <redacted>

In some drivers, disable_irq() call don't be symmetric with enable_irq()
, disable_irq() will be called before call free_irq().

Which upstream drivers you refer to?

Shouldn't it be the unbalanced call for these drivers?

quoted

But both disable_irq() and free_irq() will call
rockchip_irq_gc_mask_set_bit,>
 and clk_disable() will be called more times than clk_enable(), which will

cause bugs.

I think we can correct that by checking of mask.If mask is already set, do
nothing.

Looks like a little hacky to me.

that may be true, but on first glance I tend to agree with Jacob.
Look for example at (a driver using disable_irq I picked at random) drivertc/
rtcrs/-tps6586x.c .

yep, I took a quick look at the files you pointed to, and it seems
there should be the problems for what this patch to deal with. Probably
I didn't see this error since the drivers we was using happened to
handle it properly but maybe not for other drivers. I am okay if this
could solve problems for Jacob.

In its probe function it does devm_request_irq directly followed by
disable_irq on its alarm interrupt. The interrupt only gets enabled again if
the rtc alarm gets enabled. So you can easily run into the disable + free case
there as well. Similar probably in a lot of other drivers.


Heiko

quoted

quoted

Change-Id: If19912c7658253e15531c04db6c70fdbffd5960a

remove this.

quoted

Signed-off-by: Jacob Chen <redacted>
---

 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c

b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c index c6c04ac..9a8804a 100644

--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c

@@ -2334,8 +2334,12 @@ static void rockchip_irq_gc_mask_clr_bit(struct

irq_data *d)>
 void rockchip_irq_gc_mask_set_bit(struct irq_data *d)
 {

 	struct irq_chip_generic *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);

+	struct irq_chip_type *ct = irq_data_get_chip_type(d);

 	struct rockchip_pin_bank *bank = gc->private;

+	if (*ct->mask_cache & d->mask)
+		return;
+

 	irq_gc_mask_set_bit(d);
 	clk_disable(bank->clk);

 }

--
2.7.4


_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

-- 
Best Regards
Shawn Lin