Re: [PATCH 02/12] pinctrl: Add core pinctrl support for Aspeed SoCs
From: Linus Walleij <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-12 13:18:17
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-devicetree, lkml
From: Linus Walleij <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-12 13:18:17
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-devicetree, lkml
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 2:33 AM, Andrew Jeffery [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
quoted
+ + while (*exprs) { + if (strncmp((*exprs)->signal, "GPIO", 4) == 0) + return true;This looks a bit fragile and hard to debug. Do you have some better idea of how to do this but not resort to string comparison?Yes, this is a little unfortunate. GPIO is not always a pin's lowest priority function (e.g. the RGMII/RMII pins), so this makes the GPIO case like any other mux function: We need to know when to stop iterating the arrays when disabling mux functions of higher priority. The alternative is probably to introduce another field to struct aspeed_sig_expr and set that as necessary, but that feels redundant if we keep to a consistent naming for the GPIOs.
I would probably prefer that option (introduce another field) but you should make the overall decision, it's no strong opinion from my side.
Would it be acceptable to document that requirement?
Sure. Yours, Linus Walleij