Re: [PATCH v6] gpio: add Intel WhiskeyCove PMIC GPIO driver
From: Andy Shevchenko <hidden>
Date: 2016-07-25 13:31:40
Also in:
lkml
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 9:45 PM, Bin Gao [off-list ref] wrote:
This patch introduces a separate GPIO driver for Intel WhiskeyCove PMIC. This driver is based on gpio-crystalcove.c. Signed-off-by: Ajay Thomas <redacted> Signed-off-by: Bin Gao <redacted> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <redacted> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
There are still (minor) issues, since the patch most likely will not make v4.8-rc1, my comments below.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig index 536112f..0f33982 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig@@ -806,6 +806,19 @@ config GPIO_CRYSTAL_COVE This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module will be called gpio-crystalcove. +config GPIO_WHISKEY_COVE
I think it should follow alphabetical order.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
--- a/drivers/gpio/Makefile +++ b/drivers/gpio/Makefile@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_BT8XX) += gpio-bt8xx.o obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_CLPS711X) += gpio-clps711x.o obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_CS5535) += gpio-cs5535.o obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_CRYSTAL_COVE) += gpio-crystalcove.o +obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_WHISKEY_COVE) += gpio-wcove.o
Ditto.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-wcove.c@@ -0,0 +1,439 @@ +/* + * gpio-wcove.c - Intel Whiskey Cove GPIO Driver
No file name.
+ */ + +#include <linux/seq_file.h> +#include <linux/bitops.h> +#include <linux/regmap.h> +#include <linux/interrupt.h> +#include <linux/platform_device.h> +#include <linux/gpio/driver.h> +#include <linux/mfd/intel_soc_pmic.h>
Perhaps alphabetical order.
+/* GPIO output control registers(one per pin): 0x4e44 - 0x4e50 */
Space before (.
+#define GPIO_OUT_CTRL_BASE 0x4e44 +/* GPIO input control registers(one per pin): 0x4e51 - 0x4e5d */
Ditto. Needs to be changed in a whole file.
+#define CTLI_INTCNT_DIS (0)
It seems I commented this. Please, use (0 << 1)
+#define CTLI_INTCNT_NE (1 << 1) +#define CTLI_INTCNT_PE (2 << 1) +#define CTLI_INTCNT_BE (3 << 1) + +#define CTLO_DIR_IN (0)
(0 << 5)
+#define CTLO_DIR_OUT (1 << 5) +
+#define CTLO_DRV_MASK (1 << 4)
I'm not sure it makes sense for 1 bit, perhaps you may use _SHIFT macro instead.
+#define CTLO_DRV_OD (0)
(0 << 4)
+#define CTLO_DRV_CMOS CTLO_DRV_MASK
Perhaps (1 << 4)
+ +#define CTLO_DRV_REN (1 << 3) + +#define CTLO_RVAL_2KDW (0)
(0 << 1)
+#define CTLO_RVAL_2KUP (1 << 1) +#define CTLO_RVAL_50KDW (2 << 1)
Usually DN is used as opposite abbreviation to UP, until else is mentioned in datasheet.
+#define CTLO_RVAL_50KUP (3 << 1)
+
+#define CTLO_INPUT_SET (CTLO_DRV_CMOS | CTLO_DRV_REN | CTLO_RVAL_2KUP)
+#define CTLO_OUTPUT_SET (CTLO_DIR_OUT | CTLO_INPUT_SET)
+
+enum ctrl_register {
+ CTRL_IN,
+ CTRL_OUT,
+};
+
+/*
+ * struct wcove_gpio - Whiskey Cove GPIO controller
+ * @buslock: for bus lock/sync and unlock.
+ * @chip: the abstract gpio_chip structure.
+ * @regmap: the regmap from the parent device.
+ * @regmap_irq_chip: the regmap of the gpio irq chip.
+ * @update: pending IRQ setting update, to be written to the chip upon unlock.
+ * @intcnt_value: the Interrupt Detect value to be written.
+ * @set_irq_mask: true if the IRQ mask needs to be set, false to clear.
+ */
+struct wcove_gpio {
+ struct mutex buslock; /* irq_bus_lock */Useless comment, use above kernel doc lines.
+ struct gpio_chip chip; + struct regmap *regmaop; + struct regmap_irq_chip_data *regmap_irq_chip; + int update; + int intcnt_value;
Does value suffix has a value?
+ bool set_irq_mask;
+};
+
+static inline unsigned int to_reg(int gpio, enum ctrl_register reg_type)
+{
+ unsigned int reg;
+ int bank;
+
+ if (gpio < BANK0_NR_PINS)
+ bank = 0;
+ else if (gpio < (BANK0_NR_PINS + BANK1_NR_PINS))Internal parens are redundant.
+ bank = 1;
+ else
+ bank = 2;
+
+ if (reg_type == CTRL_IN)
+ reg = GPIO_IN_CTRL_BASE + bank;
+ else
+ reg = GPIO_OUT_CTRL_BASE + bank;
+
+ return reg;
+}
+
+static void wcove_update_irq_mask(struct wcove_gpio *wg, int gpio)
+{
+ unsigned int reg, mask;
+ int group;
+
+ group = gpio < GROUP0_NR_IRQS ? 0 : 1;Entire line is useless.
+ reg = IRQ_MASK_BASE + group; + mask = (group == 0) ? BIT(gpio % GROUP0_NR_IRQS) : + BIT((gpio - GROUP0_NR_IRQS) % GROUP1_NR_IRQS);
#define IRQ_MASK_BASE(x) (... + (x))
#define IRQ_MASK_BASE0 ...
#define IRQ_MASK_BASE1 ...
if (gpio < ...) {
reg = IRQ_MASK_BASE0;
mask = BIT(...);
} else {
reg = IRQ_MASK_BASE1;
mask = BIT(...);
}
Above will be more readable.
+ + if (wg->set_irq_mask) + regmap_update_bits(wg->regmap, reg, mask, mask); + else + regmap_update_bits(wg->regmap, reg, mask, 0); +}
+static irqreturn_t wcove_gpio_irq_handler(int irq, void *data)
+{
+ unsigned int pending, virq, gpio, mask, offset;
+ struct wcove_gpio *wg = data;
+ u8 p[2];
+
+ if (regmap_bulk_read(wg->regmap, IRQ_STATUS_BASE, p, 2)) {
+ pr_err("Failed to read irq status register\n");dev_err() ?
+ return IRQ_NONE;
+ }
+
+ pending = p[0] | (p[1] << 8);
+ if (!pending)
+ return IRQ_NONE;
+
+ /* Iterate until no interrupt is pending */
+ while (pending) {
+ /* One iteration is for all pending bits */+ for (gpio = 0; gpio < GROUP0_NR_IRQS; gpio++) {
+ if (!(pending & BIT(gpio)))
+ continue;for_each_bit() ?
+ offset = (gpio > GROUP0_NR_IRQS) ? 1 : 0;
+ mask = (offset == 1) ? BIT(gpio - GROUP0_NR_IRQS) :
+ BIT(gpio);
+ virq = irq_find_mapping(wg->chip.irqdomain, gpio);
+ handle_nested_irq(virq);
+ regmap_update_bits(wg->regmap, IRQ_STATUS_BASE + offset,
+ mask, mask);
+ }
+ /* Next iteration */
+ if (regmap_bulk_read(wg->regmap, IRQ_STATUS_BASE, p, 2)) {
+ pr_err("Failed to read irq status register\n");Ditto.
+ break;
+ }
+ pending = p[0] | (p[1] << 8);
+ }
+
+ return IRQ_HANDLED;
+}
+
+static void wcove_gpio_dbg_show(struct seq_file *s,
+ struct gpio_chip *chip)
+{
+ unsigned int ctlo, ctli, irq_mask, irq_status;
+ struct wcove_gpio *wg = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
+ int gpio, offset, group, ret = 0;
+
+ for (gpio = 0; gpio < WCOVE_GPIO_NUM; gpio++) {
+ group = gpio < GROUP0_NR_IRQS ? 0 : 1;
+ ret += regmap_read(wg->regmap, to_reg(gpio, CTRL_OUT), &ctlo);
+ ret += regmap_read(wg->regmap, to_reg(gpio, CTRL_IN), &ctli);
+ ret += regmap_read(wg->regmap, IRQ_MASK_BASE + group,
+ &irq_mask);
+ ret += regmap_read(wg->regmap, IRQ_STATUS_BASE + group,
+ &irq_status);
+ if (ret) {
+ pr_err("Failed to read registers: ctrl out/in or irq status/mask\n");dev_err() ?
+ break;
+ }
+
+ offset = gpio % 8;
+ seq_printf(s, " gpio-%-2d %s %s %s %s ctlo=%2x,%s %s\n",
+ gpio, ctlo & CTLO_DIR_OUT ? "out" : "in ",
+ ctli & 0x1 ? "hi" : "lo",
+ ctli & CTLI_INTCNT_NE ? "fall" : " ",
+ ctli & CTLI_INTCNT_PE ? "rise" : " ",
+ ctlo,
+ irq_mask & BIT(offset) ? "mask " : "unmask",
+ irq_status & BIT(offset) ? "pending" : " ");
+ }
+}
+
+static int wcove_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct intel_soc_pmic *pmic;
+ struct wcove_gpio *wg;
+ int virq, retval, irq;
+ struct device *dev;
+
+ pmic = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);I think this line needs a comment to answer to the question "why parent?"
+ if (!pmic)
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
+ if (irq < 0)
+ return irq;
+
+ dev = &pdev->dev;
+
+ wg = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*wg), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!wg)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ wg->regmap_irq_chip = pmic->irq_chip_data_level2;
+
+ platform_set_drvdata(pdev, wg);
+
+ mutex_init(&wg->buslock);
+ wg->chip.label = KBUILD_MODNAME;
+ wg->chip.direction_input = wcove_gpio_dir_in;
+ wg->chip.direction_output = wcove_gpio_dir_out;
+ wg->chip.get = wcove_gpio_get;
+ wg->chip.set = wcove_gpio_set;
+ wg->chip.set_single_ended = wcove_gpio_set_single_ended,
+ wg->chip.base = -1;
+ wg->chip.ngpio = WCOVE_VGPIO_NUM;
+ wg->chip.can_sleep = true;
+ wg->chip.parent = pdev->dev.parent;
+ wg->chip.dbg_show = wcove_gpio_dbg_show;
+ wg->regmap = pmic->regmap;
+
+ retval = devm_gpiochip_add_data(dev, &wg->chip, wg);
+ if (retval) {
+ dev_warn(dev, "add gpio chip error: %d\n", retval);
+ return retval;
+ }
+
+ gpiochip_irqchip_add(&wg->chip, &wcove_irqchip, 0,
+ handle_simple_irq, IRQ_TYPE_NONE);
+
+ virq = regmap_irq_get_virq(wg->regmap_irq_chip, irq);
+ if (virq < 0) {
+ dev_err(dev, "failed to get virtual irq by irq %d\n", irq);
+ retval = virq;
+ goto out_remove_gpio;
+ }
+
+ retval = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, virq, NULL,
+ wcove_gpio_irq_handler, IRQF_ONESHOT, pdev->name, wg);
+
+ if (retval) {
+ dev_warn(dev, "request irq(%d) failed: %d\n", retval, virq);It's not a warning as I can see. Also question if it's useful at all to print anything here?
+ goto out_remove_gpio; + } + + return 0; +
+out_remove_gpio: + devm_gpiochip_remove(dev, &wg->chip); + return retval;
Useless lines. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko