On Mon, 09 May 2016, Daniel Vetter wrote:

On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 08:32:17AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:

quoted

On Mon, 02 May 2016, Daniel Vetter wrote:

quoted

On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 11:31:44AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:

quoted

On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 9:38 PM,  [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

From: Ville Syrjälä <redacted>

GPIO lookup tables are supposed to be zero terminated. Let's do that
and avoid accidentally walking off the end.

Cc: Shobhit Kumar <redacted>
Cc: Samuel Ortiz <redacted>
Cc: Linus Walleij <redacted>
Cc: Alexandre Courbot <redacted>
Cc: Thierry Reding <redacted>
Cc: Lee Jones <redacted>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 61dd2ca2d44e ("mfd: intel_soc_pmic_core: Add lookup table for Panel Control as GPIO signal")
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <redacted>

Acked-by: Linus Walleij <redacted>

Applied to drm-intel trees, thanks for patch, reviews&acks.

Do what now?  How can you apply a patch for a subsystem you don't have
responsibility for?  This is bound to cause merge conflicts.

Oh crap, I thought Linus' ack was for the mfd stuff and didn't bother
double-checking with MAINTAINTERS. Should I throw it out again and you'll
pick it up, or ok as such?

Yes please.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html