Re: [PATCH 3/3] mfd: lpc_ich: add GPIO support for Baytrail | linux-gpio | Ratatoskr

[PATCH 0/3] gpio: Intel Baytrail support · Antoine Tenart <hidden> · 2016-01-23
[PATCH 1/3] gpio: gpio-ich: add support for Intel Baytrail · Antoine Tenart <hidden> · 2016-01-23
Re: [PATCH 1/3] gpio: gpio-ich: add support for Intel Baytrail · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2016-01-25
[PATCH 2/3] mfd: lpc_ich: use a correct mask for the GPIO base address · Antoine Tenart <hidden> · 2016-01-23
Re: [PATCH 2/3] mfd: lpc_ich: use a correct mask for the GPIO base address · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2016-01-25
Re: [PATCH 2/3] mfd: lpc_ich: use a correct mask for the GPIO base address · Peter Tyser <ptyser@xes-inc.com> · 2016-01-25
Re: [PATCH 2/3] mfd: lpc_ich: use a correct mask for the GPIO base address · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2016-02-11
[PATCH 3/3] mfd: lpc_ich: add GPIO support for Baytrail · Antoine Tenart <hidden> · 2016-01-23
Re: [PATCH 3/3] mfd: lpc_ich: add GPIO support for Baytrail · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2016-01-25
Re: [PATCH 3/3] mfd: lpc_ich: add GPIO support for Baytrail · Linus Walleij <hidden> · 2016-01-28
Re: [PATCH 3/3] mfd: lpc_ich: add GPIO support for Baytrail · Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> · 2016-01-28
Re: [PATCH 0/3] gpio: Intel Baytrail support · Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> · 2016-01-25

Re: [PATCH 3/3] mfd: lpc_ich: add GPIO support for Baytrail

From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Date: 2016-01-28 15:51:47
Also in: lkml

On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:34:40AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:

On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 5:32 PM, Antoine Tenart
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

This patch adds the GPIO support for the Baytrail family.

Signed-off-by: Antoine Tenart <redacted>

I'm confused by this and Mika's comment on patch 0.

Is the BayTrail an ICH variant or not? Or does it have
two GPIO controllers? Or um ....

It is not compatible with ICH and there is only one GPIO controller in
the SoC.