On 01/12/15 14:06, Linus Walleij wrote:

On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 6:20 PM, Sudeep Holla [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

The single pinmux controller can be cascaded to the other interrupt
controllers. Hence when propagating wake-up settings to its parent
interrupt controller, there's possiblity of detecting possible recursive
locking and getting lockdep warning.

This patch avoids this false positive by using a separate lockdep class
for this single pinctrl interrupts.

Cc: Linus Walleij <redacted>
Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <redacted>

I need Tony's ACK on this patch before applying.

Is it a regression that needs to go into fixes?

Not really, only needed by PATCH 2/2 to avoid recursive locking.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep