Re: [PATCH] gpio: pcf875x: Revert "gpio: pcf857x: Propagate wake-up setting to parent irq controller"
From: Grygorii.Strashko@linaro.org <hidden>
Date: 2015-05-14 12:32:14
Also in:
linux-omap, lkml
Hi, On 05/11/2015 08:36 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 4:13 PM, Roger Quadros [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
commit b80eef95beb0 ('gpio: pcf857x: Propagate wake-up setting to parent irq controller') introduces the following recursive locking warning while suspending dra7-evm. The issue addressed by that commit has been already resolved by commit 10a50f1ab5f0 ('genirq: Set IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE flag for dummy_irq_chip')That's not 100% correct: commit b80eef95beb0 ('gpio: pcf857x: Propagate wake-up setting to parent irq controller') fixes _two_ things: 1. warning due to missing irq_set_wake / IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE, 2. propagating set_wake, so the parent interrupt controller stays awake, as it's needed for wake-up, Only the first issue is addressed by commit 10a50f1ab5f0 ('genirq: Set IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE flag for dummy_irq_chip').quoted
and so let's revert commit b80eef95beb0 ('gpio: pcf857x: Propagate wake-up setting to parent irq controller') At least the recursive locking message no longer appears after the revert. [ 30.591905] PM: Syncing filesystems ... done. [ 30.623060] Freezing user space processes ... (elapsed 0.003 seconds) done. [ 30.634470] Freezing remaining freezable tasks ... (elapsed 0.002 seconds) done. [ 30.658288] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Synchronizing SCSI cache [ 30.663678] [ 30.663681] ============================================= [ 30.663683] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] [ 30.663688] 4.1.0-rc3 #1115 Not tainted [ 30.663693] --------------------------------------------- [ 30.663697] suspend.sh/2319 is trying to acquire lock: [ 30.663719] (class){......}, at: [<c0096ebc>] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x48/0x88 [ 30.663722] [ 30.663722] but task is already holding lock: [ 30.663734] (class){......}, at: [<c0096ebc>] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x48/0x88Does this mean .set_irq_wake() cannot call irq_set_irq_wake()? Many GPIO drivers do that, as they need to propagate wake-up state to the parent interrupt controller?
As I remember, there was similar problem, so I found corresponding patch (just FYI) ab2b926 mfd: Fix twl6030 lockdep recursion warning on setting wake IRQs Not sure such kind of solution is the best choice ( -- regards, -grygorii