Thread (4 messages) 4 messages, 4 authors, 2015-05-19

Re: [PATCH] gpio: pcf875x: Revert "gpio: pcf857x: Propagate wake-up setting to parent irq controller"

From: Grygorii.Strashko@linaro.org <hidden>
Date: 2015-05-14 12:32:14
Also in: linux-omap, lkml

Hi,

On 05/11/2015 08:36 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 4:13 PM, Roger Quadros [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
commit b80eef95beb0 ('gpio: pcf857x: Propagate wake-up setting to parent irq controller')
introduces the following recursive locking warning while suspending dra7-evm.

The issue addressed by that commit has been already resolved by
commit 10a50f1ab5f0 ('genirq: Set IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE flag for dummy_irq_chip')
That's not 100% correct: commit b80eef95beb0 ('gpio: pcf857x: Propagate wake-up
setting to parent irq controller') fixes _two_ things:
   1. warning due to missing irq_set_wake / IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE,
   2. propagating set_wake, so the parent interrupt controller stays awake, as
      it's needed for wake-up,

Only the first issue is addressed by commit 10a50f1ab5f0 ('genirq: Set
IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE flag for dummy_irq_chip').
quoted
and so let's revert commit b80eef95beb0 ('gpio: pcf857x: Propagate wake-up setting to parent irq controller')

At least the recursive locking message no longer appears after the revert.

[   30.591905] PM: Syncing filesystems ... done.
[   30.623060] Freezing user space processes ... (elapsed 0.003 seconds) done.
[   30.634470] Freezing remaining freezable tasks ... (elapsed 0.002 seconds) done.
[   30.658288] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Synchronizing SCSI cache
[   30.663678]
[   30.663681] =============================================
[   30.663683] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
[   30.663688] 4.1.0-rc3 #1115 Not tainted
[   30.663693] ---------------------------------------------
[   30.663697] suspend.sh/2319 is trying to acquire lock:
[   30.663719]  (class){......}, at: [<c0096ebc>] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x48/0x88
[   30.663722]
[   30.663722] but task is already holding lock:
[   30.663734]  (class){......}, at: [<c0096ebc>] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x48/0x88
Does this mean .set_irq_wake() cannot call irq_set_irq_wake()?
Many GPIO drivers do that, as they need to propagate wake-up state to the
parent interrupt controller?
As I remember, there was similar problem, so I found corresponding patch (just FYI)

ab2b926 mfd: Fix twl6030 lockdep recursion warning on setting wake IRQs

Not sure such kind of solution is the best choice (

-- 
regards,
-grygorii
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help