Re: [PATCH 0/2] gpio / ACPI: Two minor cleanups related to ACPI_HANDLE()

[PATCH 0/2] gpio / ACPI: Two minor cleanups related to ACPI_HANDLE() · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden> · 2015-03-10
[PATCH 1/2] gpio / ACPI: Avoid unnecessary checks in __gpiod_get_index() · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden> · 2015-03-10
Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpio / ACPI: Avoid unnecessary checks in __gpiod_get_index() · Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> · 2015-03-11
Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpio / ACPI: Avoid unnecessary checks in __gpiod_get_index() · Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> · 2015-03-11
Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpio / ACPI: Avoid unnecessary checks in __gpiod_get_index() · Linus Walleij <hidden> · 2015-03-18
[PATCH 2/2] gpio / ACPI: Use local variable instead of ACPI_HANDLE() · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden> · 2015-03-10
Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio / ACPI: Use local variable instead of ACPI_HANDLE() · Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> · 2015-03-11
Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio / ACPI: Use local variable instead of ACPI_HANDLE() · Linus Walleij <hidden> · 2015-03-18
Re: [PATCH 0/2] gpio / ACPI: Two minor cleanups related to ACPI_HANDLE() · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden> · 2015-03-18
Re: [PATCH 0/2] gpio / ACPI: Two minor cleanups related to ACPI_HANDLE() · Alexandre Courbot <hidden> · 2015-03-18
Re: [PATCH 0/2] gpio / ACPI: Two minor cleanups related to ACPI_HANDLE() · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden> · 2015-03-18

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
Date: 2015-03-18 01:13:15
Also in: linux-acpi, lkml

On Tuesday, March 10, 2015 11:07:36 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

Hi,

As per the subject, avoid evaluating ACPI_HANDLE() if we can as that one is
rather costly.

Linus, Alexandre, any objections to this series?

If not, would there be any problem if I took these to my tree?  I'll probably
have material on top of them.

Rafael

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help