Thread (46 messages) 46 messages, 7 authors, 2021-09-13

Re: [git pull] iov_iter fixes

From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Date: 2021-09-10 02:43:23
Also in: lkml
Subsystem: filesystems (vfs and infrastructure), the rest · Maintainers: Alexander Viro, Christian Brauner, Linus Torvalds

On 9/9/21 7:35 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 9/9/21 4:56 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
quoted
On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 3:21 PM Jens Axboe [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On 9/9/21 3:56 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
quoted
IOW, can't we have  that

        ret = io_iter_do_read(req, iter);

return partial success - and if XFS does that "update iovec on
failure", I could easily see that same code - or something else -
having done the exact same thing.

Put another way: if the iovec isn't guaranteed to be coherent when an
actual error occurs, then why would it be guaranteed to be coherent
with a partial success value?

Because in most cases - I'd argue pretty much all - those "partial
success" cases are *exactly* the same as the error cases, it's just
that we had a loop and one or more iterations succeeded before it hit
the error case.
Right, which is why the reset would be nice, but reexpand + revert at
least works and accomplishes the same even if it doesn't look as pretty.
You miss my point.

The partial success case seems to do the wrong thing.

Or am I misreading things? Lookie here, in io_read():

        ret = io_iter_do_read(req, iter);

let's say that something succeeds partially, does X bytes, and returns
a positive X.

The if-statements following it then do not trigger:

        if (ret == -EAGAIN || (req->flags & REQ_F_REISSUE)) {
  .. not this case ..
        } else if (ret == -EIOCBQUEUED) {
  .. nor this ..
        } else if (ret <= 0 || ret == io_size || !force_nonblock ||
                   (req->flags & REQ_F_NOWAIT) || !(req->flags & REQ_F_ISREG)) {
  .. nor this ..
        }

so nothing has been done to the iovec at all.

Then it does

        ret2 = io_setup_async_rw(req, iovec, inline_vecs, iter, true);

using that iovec that has *not* been reset, even though it really
should have been reset to "X bytes read".

See what I'm trying to say?
Yep ok I follow you now. And yes, if we get a partial one but one that
has more consumed than what was returned, that would not work well. I'm
guessing that a) we've never seen that, or b) we always end up with
either correctly advanced OR fully advanced, and the fully advanced case
would then just return 0 next time and we'd just get a short IO back to
userspace.

The safer way here would likely be to import the iovec again. We're
still in the context of the original submission, and the sqe hasn't been
consumed in the ring yet, so that can be done safely.
Totally untested, but something like this could be a better solution.
If we're still in the original submit path, then re-import the iovec and
set the iter again before doing retry. If we do get a partial
read/write return, then advance the iter to avoid re-doing parts of the
IO.

If we're already in the io-wq retry path, short IO will just be ended
anyway. That's no different than today.

Will take a closer look at this tomorrow and run some testing, but I
think the idea is sound and it avoids any kind of guessing on what was
done or not. Just re-setup the iter/iov and advance if we got a positive
result on the previous attempt.
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 855ea544807f..89c4c568d785 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -2608,8 +2608,6 @@ static bool io_resubmit_prep(struct io_kiocb *req)
 
 	if (!rw)
 		return !io_req_prep_async(req);
-	/* may have left rw->iter inconsistent on -EIOCBQUEUED */
-	iov_iter_revert(&rw->iter, req->result - iov_iter_count(&rw->iter));
 	return true;
 }
 
@@ -3431,6 +3429,28 @@ static bool need_read_all(struct io_kiocb *req)
 		S_ISBLK(file_inode(req->file)->i_mode);
 }
 
+static int io_prep_for_retry(int rw, struct io_kiocb *req, struct iovec **vecs,
+			     struct iov_iter *iter, ssize_t did_bytes)
+{
+	ssize_t ret;
+
+	/*
+	 * io-wq path cannot retry, as we cannot safely re-import vecs. It
+	 * would be perfectly legal for non-vectored IO, but we handle them
+	 * all the same.
+	 */
+	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(io_wq_current_is_worker()))
+		return did_bytes;
+
+	ret = io_import_iovec(rw, req, vecs, iter, false);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
+	if (did_bytes > 0)
+		iov_iter_advance(iter, did_bytes);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int io_read(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
 {
 	struct iovec inline_vecs[UIO_FASTIOV], *iovec = inline_vecs;
@@ -3479,9 +3499,6 @@ static int io_read(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
 		/* no retry on NONBLOCK nor RWF_NOWAIT */
 		if (req->flags & REQ_F_NOWAIT)
 			goto done;
-		/* some cases will consume bytes even on error returns */
-		iov_iter_reexpand(iter, iter->count + iter->truncated);
-		iov_iter_revert(iter, io_size - iov_iter_count(iter));
 		ret = 0;
 	} else if (ret == -EIOCBQUEUED) {
 		goto out_free;
@@ -3491,6 +3508,13 @@ static int io_read(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
 		goto done;
 	}
 
+	iovec = inline_vecs;
+	ret2 = io_prep_for_retry(READ, req, &iovec, iter, ret);
+	if (ret2 < 0) {
+		ret = ret2;
+		goto done;
+	}
+
 	ret2 = io_setup_async_rw(req, iovec, inline_vecs, iter, true);
 	if (ret2)
 		return ret2;
@@ -3614,14 +3638,16 @@ static int io_write(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
 	if (!force_nonblock || ret2 != -EAGAIN) {
 		/* IOPOLL retry should happen for io-wq threads */
 		if ((req->ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_IOPOLL) && ret2 == -EAGAIN)
-			goto copy_iov;
+			goto copy_import;
 done:
 		kiocb_done(kiocb, ret2, issue_flags);
 	} else {
+copy_import:
+		iovec = inline_vecs;
+		ret = io_prep_for_retry(WRITE, req, &iovec, iter, ret2);
+		if (ret < 0)
+			goto out_free;
 copy_iov:
-		/* some cases will consume bytes even on error returns */
-		iov_iter_reexpand(iter, iter->count + iter->truncated);
-		iov_iter_revert(iter, io_size - iov_iter_count(iter));
 		ret = io_setup_async_rw(req, iovec, inline_vecs, iter, false);
 		return ret ?: -EAGAIN;
 	}
-- 
Jens Axboe
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help