On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 01:14:06AM +0800, butt3rflyh4ck wrote:

ms = (struct minix_super_block *) bh->b_data; /// --------------> set
minix_super_block pointer
sbi->s_ms = ms;
sbi->s_sbh = bh;
sbi->s_mount_state = ms->s_state;
sbi->s_ninodes = ms->s_ninodes;
sbi->s_nzones = ms->s_nzones;
sbi->s_imap_blocks = ms->s_imap_blocks;
sbi->s_zmap_blocks = ms->s_zmap_blocks;
sbi->s_firstdatazone = ms->s_firstdatazone;
sbi->s_log_zone_size = ms->s_log_zone_size;  // ------------------>
set sbi->s_log_zone_size

So what you're saying is that if you construct a malicious minix image,
you can produce undefined behaviour?  That's not something we're
traditionally interested in, unless the filesystem is one customarily
used for data interchange (like FAT or iso9660).