Thread (69 messages) 69 messages, 9 authors, 2021-02-24

Re: [PATCH 34/33] netfs: Use in_interrupt() not in_softirq()

From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Date: 2021-02-16 09:32:11
Also in: ceph-devel, linux-cifs, linux-mm, linux-nfs, lkml

On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 09:29:31AM +0000, David Howells wrote:
Is there a better way to do it?  The intent is to process the assessment phase
in the calling thread's context if possible rather than bumping over to a
worker thread.  For synchronous I/O, for example, that's done in the caller's
thread.  Maybe that's the answer - if it's known to be asynchronous, I have to
punt, but otherwise don't have to.
Yes, i think you want an explicit flag instead.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help