Thread (37 messages) 37 messages, 4 authors, 2021-01-09
STALE1967d

[PATCH 08/13] ext4: simplify i_state checks in __ext4_update_other_inode_time()

From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-01-05 00:56:46
Also in: linux-ext4, linux-f2fs-devel, linux-xfs
Subsystem: ext4 file system, filesystems (vfs and infrastructure), the rest · Maintainers: "Theodore Ts'o", Alexander Viro, Christian Brauner, Linus Torvalds

From: Eric Biggers <redacted>

Since I_DIRTY_TIME and I_DIRTY_INODE are mutually exclusive in i_state,
there's no need to check for I_DIRTY_TIME && !I_DIRTY_INODE.  Just check
for I_DIRTY_TIME.

Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <redacted>
---
 fs/ext4/inode.c | 8 +++-----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
index 4cc6c7834312f..9e34541715968 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -4962,14 +4962,12 @@ static void __ext4_update_other_inode_time(struct super_block *sb,
 		return;
 
 	if ((inode->i_state & (I_FREEING | I_WILL_FREE | I_NEW |
-			       I_DIRTY_INODE)) ||
-	    ((inode->i_state & I_DIRTY_TIME) == 0))
+			       I_DIRTY_TIME)) != I_DIRTY_TIME)
 		return;
 
 	spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
-	if (((inode->i_state & (I_FREEING | I_WILL_FREE | I_NEW |
-				I_DIRTY_INODE)) == 0) &&
-	    (inode->i_state & I_DIRTY_TIME)) {
+	if ((inode->i_state & (I_FREEING | I_WILL_FREE | I_NEW |
+			       I_DIRTY_TIME)) != I_DIRTY_TIME) {
 		struct ext4_inode_info	*ei = EXT4_I(inode);
 
 		inode->i_state &= ~I_DIRTY_TIME;
-- 
2.30.0
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help