Re: [PATCH 18/52] virtio-fs: Map cache using the values from the capabilities
From: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <hidden>
Date: 2018-12-13 09:13:39
Also in:
kvm, lkml
* David Hildenbrand (david@redhat.com) wrote:
On 10.12.18 18:12, Vivek Goyal wrote:quoted
Instead of assuming we had the fixed bar for the cache, use the value from the capabilities. Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <redacted> --- fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)diff --git a/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c b/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c index 60d496c16841..55bac1465536 100644 --- a/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c +++ b/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c@@ -14,11 +14,6 @@ #include <uapi/linux/virtio_pci.h> #include "fuse_i.h" -enum { - /* PCI BAR number of the virtio-fs DAX window */ - VIRTIO_FS_WINDOW_BAR = 2, -}; - /* List of virtio-fs device instances and a lock for the list */ static DEFINE_MUTEX(virtio_fs_mutex); static LIST_HEAD(virtio_fs_instances);@@ -518,7 +513,7 @@ static int virtio_fs_setup_dax(struct virtio_device *vdev, struct virtio_fs *fs) struct dev_pagemap *pgmap; struct pci_dev *pci_dev; phys_addr_t phys_addr; - size_t len; + size_t bar_len; int ret; u8 have_cache, cache_bar; u64 cache_offset, cache_len;@@ -551,17 +546,13 @@ static int virtio_fs_setup_dax(struct virtio_device *vdev, struct virtio_fs *fs) } /* TODO handle case where device doesn't expose BAR? */For virtio-pmem we decided to not go via BARs as this would effectively make it only usable for virtio-pci implementers. Instead, we are going to export the applicable physical device region directly (e.g. phys_start, phys_size in virtio config), so it is decoupled from PCI details. Doing the same for virtio-fs would allow e.g. also virtio-ccw to make eventually use of this.
That makes it a very odd looking PCI device; I can see that with virtio-pmem it makes some sense, given that it's job is to expose arbitrary chunks of memory. Dave
quoted
- ret = pci_request_region(pci_dev, VIRTIO_FS_WINDOW_BAR, - "virtio-fs-window"); + ret = pci_request_region(pci_dev, cache_bar, "virtio-fs-window"); if (ret < 0) { dev_err(&vdev->dev, "%s: failed to request window BAR\n", __func__); return ret; } - phys_addr = pci_resource_start(pci_dev, VIRTIO_FS_WINDOW_BAR); - len = pci_resource_len(pci_dev, VIRTIO_FS_WINDOW_BAR); - mi = devm_kzalloc(&pci_dev->dev, sizeof(*mi), GFP_KERNEL); if (!mi) return -ENOMEM;@@ -586,6 +577,17 @@ static int virtio_fs_setup_dax(struct virtio_device *vdev, struct virtio_fs *fs) pgmap->ref = &mi->ref; pgmap->type = MEMORY_DEVICE_FS_DAX; + phys_addr = pci_resource_start(pci_dev, cache_bar); + bar_len = pci_resource_len(pci_dev, cache_bar); + + if (cache_offset + cache_len > bar_len) { + dev_err(&vdev->dev, + "%s: cache bar shorter than cap offset+len\n", + __func__); + return -EINVAL; + } + phys_addr += cache_offset; + /* Ideally we would directly use the PCI BAR resource but * devm_memremap_pages() wants its own copy in pgmap. So * initialize a struct resource from scratch (only the start@@ -594,7 +596,7 @@ static int virtio_fs_setup_dax(struct virtio_device *vdev, struct virtio_fs *fs) pgmap->res = (struct resource){ .name = "virtio-fs dax window", .start = phys_addr, - .end = phys_addr + len, + .end = phys_addr + cache_len, }; fs->window_kaddr = devm_memremap_pages(&pci_dev->dev, pgmap);@@ -607,10 +609,10 @@ static int virtio_fs_setup_dax(struct virtio_device *vdev, struct virtio_fs *fs) return ret; fs->window_phys_addr = phys_addr; - fs->window_len = len; + fs->window_len = cache_len; - dev_dbg(&vdev->dev, "%s: window kaddr 0x%px phys_addr 0x%llx len %zu\n", - __func__, fs->window_kaddr, phys_addr, len); + dev_dbg(&vdev->dev, "%s: cache kaddr 0x%px phys_addr 0x%llx len %llx\n", + __func__, fs->window_kaddr, phys_addr, cache_len); fs->dax_dev = alloc_dax(fs, NULL, &virtio_fs_dax_ops); if (!fs->dax_dev)-- Thanks, David / dhildenb
-- Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK