Re: [PATCH 03/13] Move COMPAT_ATM_ADDPARTY to net/atm/svc.c
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Date: 2015-09-17 09:57:12
Also in:
kexec, linux-api, linux-arch, lkml
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2015-11-03 · [PATCH 03/13] Move COMPAT_ATM_ADDPARTY to net/atm/svc.c · Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
- 2015-11-03 · [PATCH 03/13] Move COMPAT_ATM_ADDPARTY to net/atm/svc.c · Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
- 2015-11-03 · [PATCH 03/13] Move COMPAT_ATM_ADDPARTY to net/atm/svc.c · Palmer Dabbelt <hidden>
- 2015-11-03 · [PATCH 03/13] Move COMPAT_ATM_ADDPARTY to net/atm/svc.c · Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
- 2015-11-03 · [PATCH 03/13] Move COMPAT_ATM_ADDPARTY to net/atm/svc.c · Palmer Dabbelt <hidden>
Palmer Dabbelt [off-list ref] wrote:
+#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
+/* It actually takes struct sockaddr_atmsvc, not struct atm_iobuf */
+#define COMPAT_ATM_ADDPARTY _IOW('a', ATMIOC_SPECIAL+4, struct compat_atm_iobuf)
+#endifI wonder if it would hurt to ditch the conditionals entirely. It only eats cpp namespace, not C namespace so it won't affect the output if it is not used because the code that uses it is compiled out. David