Re: [patch 0/9] extended fdinfo via procfs series, v7
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <hidden>
Date: 2012-08-23 12:44:32
Also in:
lkml
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 08:23:18AM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 02:43:23PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:quoted
Hi guys, here is updated version of the fdinfo via procfs series, the changes from previous one are the following - fhandle is carried inside inotify mark but this feature is CONFIG dependent to not bloat the kernel for users who don't need itAs Al points out, this doesn't help much: if this feature is something a distro will want to provide, then in practice all their users are eventually going to end up with it turned on.
Yes, I remember what Al has said, the problem is that this data attached to inotify mark is not just a couple of bytes but rather about 136 bytes per mark, and encoding this fhandle will take some cycles on mark creation as well. Thus when in a sake of c/r we simply have no other way and are to pay some trade off cost for c/r functionality, i don't think the regular users (and note that CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE is off by default) should pay same cost for nothing. That's why I made it config dependant. Again if you still think that making it config-option is a bad idea I'll rip this symbols off, it's not a problem.
Could you quantify the cost somehow?
About 136 bytes per inotify mark.
I wonder if you could get away with something less than MAX_HANDLE_SIZE? 128 bytes is the maximum allowable by NFSv4. In practice I don't think any of our filesystems need more than 40 or so right now.
Look, Bruce, I would like to follow the limits we have #define'd in kernel, because it makes code easier to support. I can #define some limit for inotify fhandle but what should I print in fdinfo if say there is no space left in buffer? Cyrill