Thread (11 messages) 11 messages, 3 authors, 2012-07-17

Re: [PATCH 0/3] fs/sysv: stop using write_supers and s_dirt

From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: 2012-07-13 21:42:44
Also in: lkml

On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 17:37:58 +0300
Artem Bityutskiy [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, 2012-07-03 at 16:43 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
quoted
This patch-set makes sysv file-system stop using the VFS '->write_supers()'
call-back and the '->s_dirt' superblock field because I plan to remove them
once all users are gone.
Hi Andrew,

would you please pick this patch-set as well? I also sent you an update
for hfs and hfsplus file-systems today - found a bug while doing some
more testing. Also, I sent UFS changes today, very similar. Most
probably no one will reply and I hope you would pick them as well.
The issue Alan raised around the superblock timestamp is still up in
the air.  I guess he's a slow typist ;)

My take is "no, we don't need to do that any more" - surely all Linux
systems have a functional hardware clock.  But the changelog should be
updated to describe and justify the decision.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help