Re: [PATCH]QNX6 filesystem (RO) driver
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: 2012-02-12 22:43:59
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 11:14:38PM +0100, Kai Bankett wrote: re junk removal from qnx4 - sure, just make is a separate patch.
quoted
qnx6_iget() - what, they really don't allow named pipes/sockets/device nodes on the filesystem? If not, you can just use init_special_inode() instead of that printk+iget_failed().At least so far I could not find any additional extras. I followed your advise and used init_special_inode() to get rid of that printk+stuff.
Umm... How does qnx encode device numbers for block/character devices?
Yes, I have the name length in the directory entry, but only for short filenames. For long filenames the length field in the directory entry is always 0xff. I just moved the length check up by one if-clause. Personally I don't think that moving it around further makes that much sense, as the length for short filenames is also checked before copying the filename. The way it currently is it's at least symmetrical between short und long filename handling code. I hope I got all the points and fixes right?
A few more things: * duplicating di_block_ptr[] array seems to be pointless * qnx6_get_inode_loc(), qnx6_dir_lfile_block() and qnx6_block_map() seem to have a lot of duplicated code, at the very least. Looks like a missing helper function... Incidentally, I'd switched qnx6_get_devblock() and qnx6_check_blockptr() to __fs32 argument, along with making QNX6_PTR_UNSET (~(__fs32)0) * what is actually stored in ->de_size for long entries in case of big-endian fs? 4 bytes of de_inode - fine, as as for short ones, but then what? If it's really 32bit big-endian 0xff, it will have the first byte equal to 0, which would confuse the living hell out of your code. Or is it actually __u8 + 3 bytes of padding? Then it would be compatible with short dir entries, but conversions would be the wrong thing to do there... * I seriously suspect that you want to cook yourself a couple of unhashed in-core struct inode for Longfile and Inode ones; then get_inode_loc(), dir_lfile_block() and block_map() would become identical *and* you just might be able to use page cache instead of all that messing with buffer_heads in readdir et.al. Just do new_inode() and fill di_block_ptr/levels/i_mode/i_size and ->a_ops. iput() both in ->put_super() and that's it... For directories in pagecache see how e.g. ext2 is doing it - or minixfs, for that matter. * mmu_private is never used. Just lose it...