Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] seccomp_filters: system call filtering using BPF

[PATCH v5 1/3] seccomp: kill the seccomp_t typedef · Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org> · 2012-01-27
[PATCH v5 3/3] Documentation: prctl/seccomp_filter · Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org> · 2012-01-27
[PATCH v5 2/3] seccomp_filters: system call filtering using BPF · Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org> · 2012-01-27
Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] seccomp_filters: system call filtering using BPF · Cong Wang <hidden> · 2012-01-28
Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] seccomp_filters: system call filtering using BPF · Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org> · 2012-01-28
Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] seccomp_filters: system call filtering using BPF · Andrew Lutomirski <hidden> · 2012-01-28
Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] seccomp_filters: system call filtering using BPF · Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org> · 2012-01-28
Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] seccomp_filters: system call filtering using BPF · Indan Zupancic <hidden> · 2012-01-29
Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] seccomp_filters: system call filtering using BPF · Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org> · 2012-01-29
Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] seccomp_filters: system call filtering using BPF · Indan Zupancic <hidden> · 2012-01-30
Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] seccomp_filters: system call filtering using BPF · Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org> · 2012-01-30
Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] seccomp_filters: system call filtering using BPF · Andrew Lutomirski <hidden> · 2012-01-30
Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] seccomp_filters: system call filtering using BPF · Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org> · 2012-01-30
Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] seccomp_filters: system call filtering using BPF · Indan Zupancic <hidden> · 2012-01-30
Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] seccomp_filters: system call filtering using BPF · Indan Zupancic <hidden> · 2012-01-31
Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] seccomp_filters: system call filtering using BPF · Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org> · 2012-01-31
Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] seccomp_filters: system call filtering using BPF · Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org> · 2012-01-31
Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] seccomp_filters: system call filtering using BPF · Indan Zupancic <hidden> · 2012-02-01
Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] seccomp_filters: system call filtering using BPF · Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org> · 2012-02-01
Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] seccomp_filters: system call filtering using BPF · Indan Zupancic <hidden> · 2012-02-01
Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] seccomp_filters: system call filtering using BPF · Roland McGrath <hidden> · 2012-02-01
Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] seccomp: kill the seccomp_t typedef · Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de> · 2012-01-27
Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] seccomp: kill the seccomp_t typedef · Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org> · 2012-01-27
Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] seccomp: kill the seccomp_t typedef · Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> · 2012-01-28
Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] seccomp: kill the seccomp_t typedef · Cong Wang <hidden> · 2012-01-28
Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] seccomp: kill the seccomp_t typedef · Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org> · 2012-01-28

From: Andrew Lutomirski <hidden>
Date: 2012-01-30 22:29:54
Also in: lkml

[not quoting anything because this is a more general question]

How portable across architectures is this supposed to be?  At least
syscall numbering varies widely, and calling conventions can be
different (x86_64 has four of them, for example).  For all I know,
argument order might be different in some cases.

--Andy

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help