Re: [PATCH] deadlock with suspend and quotas
From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Date: 2012-01-03 18:35:32
Also in:
dm-devel, lkml
On Tue, 3 Jan 2012, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
On Tue, 3 Jan 2012, Al Viro wrote:quoted
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 03:25:16PM -0500, Mikulas Patocka wrote:quoted
The following patch fixes the deadlock. When the quota subsystem takes s_umount, it checks if the filesystem is frozen. If it is, we drop s_umount, wait for the filesystem to resume and retry. Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com> CC: stable@kernel.orgSo basically you want a variant of get_super() that would get you a superblock for this bdev, locked and unfrozen? Fair enough, but * that should be a proper helper in super.c, rather than open-coded in fs/quota/quota.c, of all places * what about other existing callers get_super() and its friends?Hi You can look at that functionality here: I've already made a patch that has it: https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2011-November/msg00151.html
Sorry, I accidentally linked to the message you were responding to. The point is that there are some users of get_super that need to get superblock even if it's frozen and other users of get_super that must not get a frozen superblock. So I made a bool parameter to distinguish these cases. Do you have some other ideas? Mikulas
Basically, the patch introduces a function down_read_s_umount, which takes s_umount for read, but makes sure that the filesystem is not frozen. Then, it adds a boolean parameter to get_super() which tells get_super() that it should wait for unfreeze (i.e. call "down_read_s_umount" isntead of "down_read(&sb->s_umount)"). Mikulasquoted
and while we are at it, why in damnation name is it exported? The only caller outside of core VFS is under #if 0...