Re: [patch 2/2] fs, proc: Introduce the /proc/<pid>/map_files/ directory v12
From: Vasiliy Kulikov <hidden>
Date: 2011-09-14 16:22:13
Also in:
lkml
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 20:13 +0400, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
quoted
No, I mean something else. Assume you have a task, which does the steps: 1) opens some sensitive file as root. This file is e.g. 0700. 2) mmaps the file via opened fd, either RO or RW. 3) closes fd. 4) drops root. Now it has a mapping of a privileged file, but cannot get fd of it anyhow. With map_files/ he may open his own /proc/$$/map_files/, pass ptrace() check, and get fd of the privileged file. He cannot explicitly open it as it is 0700, but he may open it via map_files/ and get RO/RW fd.What is the problem here - the fact that we have some file considered to be private be open-able by somebody else, or the fact that we can truncate the file being mapped?
The latter - the file, which is considered to be restricted to a process as W only without ability to truncate it, now can be truncated. The process after (4) had no such ability without map_files/ with current permission model of mmap'ed files. Or I am missing something? FWIW, ftruncate() might be not the only syscall which makes sense to use in this case, I just thought about it. Thanks, -- Vasiliy Kulikov http://www.openwall.com - bringing security into open computing environments