Thread (20 messages) 20 messages, 8 authors, 2011-07-29

Re: Nanosecond fs timestamp support: sad

From: J. Bruce Fields <hidden>
Date: 2011-07-22 23:49:25
Also in: lkml

On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 07:06:12PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 08:59:15AM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
quoted
But does anyone apart from NFSv4 actually *want* i_version as opposed to the
more-generally-useful precise timestamps?
It *seems* like a generally useful idea, but I don't know of any other
users.
(Out of curiosity: what actually *needs* real timestamps?:
	- They're generally useful to people, of course; ("what did I
	  change last tuesday?")
	- Make uses them, though in theory perhaps it could do the same
	  job by caching records like "object X was built from
	  versions a, b, and c of objects A, B, and C respectively".

But a lot of uses are probably just to answer the question "did this
file change since the last time I looked at it"?

Of course, however theoretically useful, there's always the argument
that linux-specific interfaces are unlikely to be used by anyone except
Lennart Poettering.)

--b.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help