Thread (12 messages) 12 messages, 3 authors, 2011-02-24

Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fixes for vfs-scale and vfs-automount

From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: 2011-02-24 03:14:39
Also in: linux-nfs, lkml

On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:03:38AM +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
I also have a sick feeling that dentrys may become negative at any point
after __d_lookup_rcu() .....
Yes.  To get stability of ->d_inode (assuming the sucker isn't pinned down
in normal way by ->d_count) you need ->d_lock.
quoted
Ho-hum...  I can reach RHTS, but I'd rather do that at home boxen, if
possible...  Has it been reproduced on UP boxen with SMP kernels, BTW?
Nope, I'd need to build a kernel specifically for that. I'm not sure how
useful that would be though since the test is specifically meant to
expose problems with multiple concurrent processes accessing an
automount tree. I don't see any problem running the Connectathon tests
which is essentially one automount and one client process.
Heh...  No, it's just that the only SMP box I have locally right now
is dual ultrasparc.  Anyway, I can live with RHTS.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help