Thread (579 messages) 579 messages, 89 authors, 2004-09-17

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4

From: <hidden>
Date: 2004-08-29 18:57:49
Also in: lkml

On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 07:36:29PM +0100, viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk wrote:
quoted
he wants without recompiling to do it.  This kind of a view requires no 
coding because you can just mount the root filesystem two ways, one with 
the -nopseudos mount option, and one without it.
*What*?

OK, now I want detailed explanation of the reasons why that doesn't create
cache coherency problems.

Do you have an analysis of locking in the entire thing?
And I am very, very serious about that - we are talking about very nasty
minefield and design choices in that area have fundamental impact on the
entire layer, wherever it is located.

It's *NOT* something that you can leave until later and hope it somehow
falls into place - it can be merged in steps, but you MUST know the goal
on that level.  To rearchitect later might be possible (even though you
will a hell of a time avoiding plugins breakage), but it will be *hard*.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help