Thread (6 messages) read the whole thread 6 messages, 4 authors, 2026-06-26

Re: [PATCH] staging: fbtft: use ARRAY_SIZE() in NUMARGS macro

From: David Laight <hidden>
Date: 2026-06-26 13:41:35
Also in: dri-devel, linux-staging, lkml

On Fri, 26 Jun 2026 14:27:25 +0530
Joyeta Modak [off-list ref] wrote:
Thank you for the feedback and the question.

I checked every write_reg() across all fbtft drivers and found that
the largest number of arguments is 129 in write_reg(par,
MIPI_DCS_WRITE_LUT,...)
As COUNT_ARGS() in args.h only supports up to 15, it is not a safe fit here.
That is also a pretty horrid way to write that message out.
The function call itself uses well over 512 bytes of stack.
Then there is all the code to push the arguments.

It really shouldn't be too hard to pass the address of a const u8[]
all the way through to the code that copies the data to the hardware.

I tried to follow the code earlier. The 'common functions' that pretty
much just call back through per-driver functions with names the 'write'
really don't make it easy.

	David
However, the kernel test robot reported a problem with my
implementation as the __must_be_array() check in ARRAY_SIZE() requires
the array to be a compile time constant expression and thus breaks the
call at several places.(example par->bgr)

I tried to reproduce this locally on my system using both GCC and
Clang with ARCH=um on x86_64 but could not reproduce the build
failure.

Since the original sizeof() based approach had no such errors flagged,
I am thinking of dropping the ARRAY_SIZE() approach.

Any other feedback is appreciated. Thanks again.

On Wed, Jun 24, 2026 at 5:01 PM Andy Shevchenko
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Jun 24, 2026 at 01:08:04PM +0530, Joyeta Modak wrote:  
quoted
NUMARGS() computes the number of arguments by dividing the size of a
temporary int array by sizeof(int). Using the standard ARRAY_SIZE()
macro is the correct way to count array elements in the kernel, and
ARRAY_SIZE() also provides a __must_be_array() compile time check. There
are no functional changes.  
...
 
quoted
-#define NUMARGS(...)  (sizeof((int[]){__VA_ARGS__}) / sizeof(int))
+#define NUMARGS(...)  ARRAY_SIZE(((int[]){__VA_ARGS__}))

 #define write_reg(par, ...)                                            \
      ((par)->fbtftops.write_register(par, NUMARGS(__VA_ARGS__), __VA_ARGS__))  
What is the maximum parameters .write_register() takes in practice in the
fbtft drivers? If it's less than or equal to 15, we may use args.h instead.

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

 
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help