Thread (4 messages) 4 messages, 2 authors, 2026-06-08
COLD36d

[PATCH 1/2] staging: fbtft: fb_ra8875: prefer usleep_range over udelay

From: Georgii Druzhinin <hidden>
Date: 2026-06-07 20:17:23
Also in: dri-devel, linux-staging, lkml
Subsystem: fbtft framebuffer drivers, staging subsystem, the rest · Maintainers: Andy Shevchenko, Greg Kroah-Hartman, Linus Torvalds

Replace udelay(100) with usleep_range(100, 120) to avoid busy-waiting
and allow the scheduler to utilize the CPU during the delay.

Signed-off-by: Georgii Druzhinin <redacted>
---
 drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_ra8875.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_ra8875.c b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_ra8875.c
index 0ab1de6647d0..6058934e2ca2 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_ra8875.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_ra8875.c
@@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ static void write_reg8_bus8(struct fbtft_par *par, int len, ...)
 	}
 	len--;
 
-	udelay(100);
+	usleep_range(100, 120);
 
 	if (len) {
 		buf = (u8 *)par->buf;
@@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ static void write_reg8_bus8(struct fbtft_par *par, int len, ...)
 
 	/* restore user spi-speed */
 	par->fbtftops.write = fbtft_write_spi;
-	udelay(100);
+	usleep_range(100, 120);
 }
 
 static int write_vmem16_bus8(struct fbtft_par *par, size_t offset, size_t len)
-- 
2.54.0
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help