Thread (43 messages) 43 messages, 12 authors, 2024-05-03

Re: [PATCH v0 00/14] Make I2C terminology more inclusive for I2C Algobit and consumers

From: Easwar Hariharan <hidden>
Date: 2024-04-05 17:09:07
Also in: amd-gfx, dri-devel, intel-gfx, intel-xe, linux-i2c, linux-media, lkml, nouveau

Hi Wolfram,

On 4/5/2024 3:18 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
Hello Easwar,

On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 05:00:24PM +0000, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
quoted
I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C specifications have replaced "master/slave"
with more appropriate terms. Inspired by and following on to Wolfram's
series to fix drivers/i2c/[1], fix the terminology for users of the
I2C_ALGOBIT bitbanging interface, now that the approved verbiage exists
in the specification.
I really appreciate that you want to assist in this task to improve the
I2C core. I do. I am afraid, however, that you took the second step
before the first one, though. As I mentioned in my original cover
letter, this is not only about renaming but also improving the I2C API
(splitting up header files...). So, drivers are not a priority right
now. They can be better fixed once the core is ready.
Sorry, got excited. :) There were drivers I'd been part of that I specifically
wanted to fixup, but then the scope grew to other users of algobit.
It is true that I changed quite some controller drivers within the i2c
realm. I did this to gain experience. As you also noticed quite some
questions came up. We need to agree on answers first. And once we are
happy with the answers we found, then IMO we can go outside of the i2c
realm and send patches to other subsystems referencing agreed
precedence. I intentionally did not go outside i2c yet. Since your
patches are already there, you probably want to foster them until they
are ready for inclusion.
Sorry, I don't quite follow what you mean by foster in this context. Are
you asking me to hold off on merging the series, or to follow through on
getting it merged?

 Yet, regarding further patches, my suggestion
is to wait until the core is ready. That might take a while, though.
However, there is enough to discuss until the core is ready. So, your
collaboration there is highly appreciated!
quoted
The last patch updating the .master_xfer method to .xfer depends on
patch 1 of Wolfram's series below, but the series is otherwise
independent. It may make sense for the last patch to go in with
Please drop the last patch from this series. It will nicely remove the
dependency. Also, like above, I first want to gain experience with i2c
before going to other subsystems. That was intended.
Will do, thanks!
All the best and happy hacking,

   Wolfram
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help